Controversial Dismissal in Final as Adams’ Movement Challenges Umpire Decision

In Sunday’s final between Sunrisers Leeds and Trent Rockets, batter Litchfield scored 10 runs off her first four balls before being caught at short fine leg while attempting to lap-sweep seamer Charley Phillips. This dismissal has sparked controversy due to a movement made by fielder Adams prior to the delivery, which has raised questions regarding the legality of the catch.

The MCC issued a statement on Tuesday indicating that Adams’ lateral movement to her left while Phillips was running in constituted a violation of cricket’s Law 28.6. This law states that any movement by a fielder, aside from the wicket-keeper, after the ball comes into play and before it reaches the striker is deemed unfair. Specific exceptions include minor adjustments related to the striker’s wicket and movement in response to the striker’s intended shot.

The MCC noted, “The batter has an absolute right to know where the fielders are, and any change of position, like Adams’ movement during the run-up, is a clear violation of this right. Any sideways movement after the bowler begins their run-up, until the striker signifies what shot they will play, is therefore illegal.” Unfortunately, the on-field umpires did not notice this illegal movement, allowing the dismissal to stand; had they identified the issue, they would have called a dead ball and awarded five penalty runs to the batting side.

After the match, in which she was named player of the match for taking 2 wickets for 9 runs in 15 balls and contributing to a run-out, Adams described the catch as “pretty surreal.” She explained, “I had this sense that she was going to ramp. I saw her take a quick glance at the field behind and she knew that they were both up, and it’s obviously a big part of her game. I thought, if I see her go for it, I’m just going to charge, and thankfully I stuck a hand out and it stuck.”

Special Credits: Image Courtesy of Espn